Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] [Sidrops] sidrops

Hi Robert,

On 12 August, chairs/secretaries received the e-mail to request meeting slots for IETF112, so I went to https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/sreq/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/sreq/> and filled out the details for sidrops, including the “conflicts to avoid” (idr, opsawg, grow, opsec)
Then submitted the form. 
An e-mail was then sent to the sidrops wg, confirming that I sent a scheduling request, but without the conflict listed, see:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/UAuL2qb5hDJI6NcboiJXuq8XmZ4/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/UAuL2qb5hDJI6NcboiJXuq8XmZ4/>

In datatracker, the conflicts appear though. 
I hope this helps.

Thanks,
Nathalie

> Op 17 aug. 2021, om 16:31 heeft Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi Nathalie
> Where are you not seeing what you expect?
> If its at /meeting/requests, note that as i send this, that page is still showing 111. That’s a consequence of the meetings being close together this time, the default meeting is still 111 to aid with materials collection. You can see the 112 requests at /meeting/112/requests
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Aug 17, 2021, at 2:57 AM, Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi tools team!
>>> 
>>> Yesterday, I scheduled a meeting for IETF112 for sidrops, and I filled out the conflicts for the WG chairs etc. but this was not shown in the output. 
>>> I have a screenshot showing it was correctly filled out:
>>> Could you look into this?
>>> 
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Nathalie
>>> (Sidrops sec)
>>> 
>>> <Schermafbeelding 2021-08-16 om 09.21.21.png>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
>>>> 
>>>> Van: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com <mailto:randy@psg.com>>
>>>> Onderwerp: Antw: [Sidrops] sidrops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 112
>>>> Datum: 16 augustus 2021 om 17:41:05 CEST
>>>> Aan: Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net <mailto:nathalie@ripe.net>>
>>>> Kopie: sidrops-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, warren@kumari.net <mailto:warren@kumari.net>
>>>> Opnieuw-verstuurd-door: <alias-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
>>>> Opnieuw-verstuurd-aan: keyur@arrcus.com <mailto:keyur@arrcus.com>, nathalie@ripe.net <mailto:nathalie@ripe.net>, morrowc@ops-netman.net <mailto:morrowc@ops-netman.net>
>>>> 
>>>>>>> Conflicts to Avoid: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> idr
>>>>>> grow
>>>>>> opsawg
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yep, doesn’t show in the output, but is in the input. I have a
>>>>> screenshot as evidence ;)
>>>> 
>>>> is that purported screenshot certified by a third party?  :)
>>>> 
>>>> this sounds like a bug that should be reported.
>>>> 
>>>> randy
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] [Sidrops] sidrops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 112