IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Bug Report: Incorrectly determines if the document is on a telechat agenda

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 11 June 2012 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F49921F8573 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bf4tr4UVLXZx for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC20C21F856D for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5BL09DU039858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:00:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4FD65C56.9090307@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:00:06 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <85E52302-8F96-4DE2-99A5-0DC3DF9B7ED4@vigilsec.com> <4FD6506D.7060208@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FD6506D.7060208@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Bug Report: Incorrectly determines if the document is on a telechat agenda
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-development>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:00:16 -0000

I can recreate it - it's still there.

Will follow up with you and Russ directly.

RjS

On 6/11/12 3:09 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> On 2012-06-11 18:39 Russ Housley said the following:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions/edit/ballotwriteupnotes/
>>
>>   When I went to issues the ballot, I was told that the document was
>> not on any agenda.  However, it is.
> Ok, that sounds like a bug, all right.
>
> I've just deployed a new release, v4.20; could I ask you to check whether
> the bug is still present?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> 	Henrik
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email