Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: idnits in draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-ps

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 20 March 2007 16:39 UTC

Return-path: <tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HThMg-0003Gm-1f; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:39:14 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HThMe-0003G9-Ng for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:39:12 -0400
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HThME-0007FC-SJ for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:39:12 -0400
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2007 17:38:47 +0100
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2KGckA8021421; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:38:46 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l2KGcUlZ011929; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:30 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-332.cisco.com ([144.254.231.73]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:38:30 +0100
Received: from [10.0.0.240] ([10.61.66.64]) by xfe-ams-332.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:38:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <46000047.8000603@levkowetz.com>
References: <4BCA7B44-4BF8-4694-AF3B-EBA4B06EB86E@cisco.com> <45FF9660.30201@nttv6.net> <167C8585-0E46-479A-8E42-5562AA9040D4@cisco.com> <46000047.8000603@levkowetz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <12F9D44B-6738-4137-8B10-85C4FD0966DA@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: idnits in draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-ps
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:38:27 +0100
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2007 16:38:29.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[30FA1B40:01C76B0E]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=239; t=1174408726; x=1175272726; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Tools-discuss]=20Re=3A=20idnits=20in=20draft-ietf-v6 ops-addr-select-ps |Sender:=20; bh=SfnJCyqJH3BMUvRzoPczUrQgc017ffrMWr40/Ur1Eek=; b=wdjfWqxGSZZHpXaky9e5M60AkNMBpb+UMC68j3zubXXnInncsC+8MpuEQuXe5oKuhPfhYbFE YTpTlhrbtJSA0dqhh79uw6yjJrVgBUp2CCmExH4qkRxASSXfFby7XFgA;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: fujisaki@syce.net, Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net>, kanayama@inetcore.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

> It seems to me that (a) is preferable, as (b) has the drawback
> that people won't generally know about it unless we produce a
> rfc3849bis.

I'm OK wit (a) accept all ULAs.

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss