Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 31 March 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582E3120188 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=gqaQnxF1; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=xJOkZZ2H
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHdnwiGQJUtj for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7611F12011C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.224.146.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2VHD6Xo004279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1554052397; x=1554138797; bh=v8RAZQy89FiRTbuOjqLmqya/IUw7y/vZOsxzdIg/cCE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=gqaQnxF1gwNnOBg8kQB22dbxCce5HiBFlxgC8aaxCj317boMUBxw6bHgELFcpAopr hWuPs5x8/YOcuLIvphQoef1mexjLfOjsNMbn5yN4t3DQvsDzJmPTHr7bLmO37BUikH CwiZfPYDMk8kHL7YGrtbgw2UYdVlPMFVKz4LpQUo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1554052397; x=1554138797; i=@elandsys.com; bh=v8RAZQy89FiRTbuOjqLmqya/IUw7y/vZOsxzdIg/cCE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=xJOkZZ2HtRCUoBU2bKWsU9DMenf0JNRkigUni5inof+E7dI5czuAL98FVNYg3S+d6 XpoMJw0u3dwYq0gmuvPRMkNlZC3ucfQLQHgrBh1I9EemvBycjGycQ3agjh0yQbHkez fC/FZn7416rP91V8O8UdJVbmHn6OvM+Hdzc2PFY0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190331100437.0ba594b0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 10:12:51 -0700
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <FED40295-9754-4B97-B6EF-D4704329185B@vigilsec.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190331092923.0c953848@elandnews.com> <FED40295-9754-4B97-B6EF-D4704329185B@vigilsec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/30nSDm0Q38KXe3OpjcyYuMlFLZs>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:13:20 -0000

Hi Russ,
At 09:57 AM 31-03-2019, Russ Housley wrote:
>If only the rev number is changing, the "replaces" should not be 
>used.  The "replaces" is used to indicate an older file name, and it 
>is most commonly used to indicate that an individual draft has been 
>adopted by a WG.

Thanks for the explanation.  I attempted a "Replaces" for 
draft-klensin-recall-rev-00.   Does the datatracker cater for that 
given that the two drafts are not WG documents?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy