Re: [Tools-discuss] Weird HTML retrieval result
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 20:56 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA8B129B5A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzN4OF5RBBNc for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EE0129B56 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1FE30041B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Cxbv8MCI-ICD for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 744603001A6; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B12222A-EAAF-47B1-93B4-9F8F0E827D77@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:56:30 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F1EC20DE-C5DA-4620-9515-55A7F90F7C09@vigilsec.com>
References: <5B12222A-EAAF-47B1-93B4-9F8F0E827D77@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/63ev-gKUzXyOvts0x0hRB_9vYfo>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Weird HTML retrieval result
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:56:34 -0000
Works for me. The tools site needs to detect the new I-D, fetch it, convert it, and post it. On the I-D cut-off submission day, there are many more I-Ds being posted than usual, so the delay should not be a surprise. Russ > On Mar 13, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-cbor-time-tag-00 > > for a couple of minutes yielded an empty file > > draft-bormann-cbor-time-tag-00.dms > > (Not exactly earth-shaking right now, so I’m sending this to this lower-priority alias.) > > Grüße, Carsten
- [Tools-discuss] Weird HTML retrieval result Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Weird HTML retrieval result Russ Housley