[Tools-discuss] webex/webrtc
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 14 February 2017 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57684129661 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:04:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wh0kscsXCnz3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050411294AE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 06:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204032009E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:25:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0A26381A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:04:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:04:11 -0500
Message-ID: <25691.1487081051@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/6QCXzQJB339Tjfm1pBFNfSTJcp4>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] webex/webrtc
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:04:17 -0000
The ietf.webex.com instance went away last week mysteriously. I'm guessing because it was donation, it got "cleaned up". (And a few months ago the certificate went invalid) The webrtc interface to webex seems to have gone away. It had improved: you could now lead a meeting with it. But, it's gone again, I don't know if it's just me, or what. Given this situation, I'd like to ask for some clarity: - what's the plan? - when are we going to return to dogfood? - since we have no clear SLA, maybe we should just do our own thing? (JITSI?) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Tools-discuss] webex/webrtc Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] webex/webrtc Ted Lemon
- Re: [Tools-discuss] webex/webrtc Michael Richardson