[Tools-discuss] Idnits and replaced-by
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 22 March 2017 16:17 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39547129A94 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kv3TR9-6E-4F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E82129A52 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2MGGj66002909 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vpFDs0MbczDHZL; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511892204.273338-aab3709706273e764a32538bd5f4114f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:44 +0100
Message-Id: <31728B82-5363-4B6B-B11D-E5DB0AEB5CBC@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/80o64lv93YVvHMWcZ7PqMHfnTOI>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits and replaced-by
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:17:06 -0000
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-comi/ properly shows that this draft replaces the earlier draft-vanderstok-core-comi I just ran idnits on RFC8132-to-be and it did not alert me to the fact that the RFC-to-be still points to the old, replaced draft. This is not the first time; I have seen erratic replaced-by performance with idnits before. Does anyone know the reason? Grüße, Carsten
- [Tools-discuss] Idnits and replaced-by Carsten Bormann