Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git repository ?

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 13 February 2019 01:42 UTC

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:42:29 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6af526a4-1b57-d93c-590d-74828b41546a@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902122038330.15552@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902121851230.15552@bofh.nohats.ca> <6af526a4-1b57-d93c-590d-74828b41546a@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/9vxdw_7-2WCH-ClHzmVrp2t6JeY>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git repository ?
Precedence: list

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

> Huh.  Indeed, it has, but not intentionally.  I'll put it back.

Thanks!

I've gone through a lot of python upgrading to get the fedora/centos
package to be up to date, but I failed to find the python pango bindings
it complains about when I run it. Where can these be found?

Requirements I needed that were not listed in requirements.txt:
weasyprint
pango ?

And is "six" really needed on a python3 system?

Thanks for having the online version. I had to go that since I couldn't
generate the rfc txt from xml :/

Thanks,

Paul

[Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git repo… Paul Wouters
Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git … Henrik Levkowetz
Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git … Paul Wouters
Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git … Henrik Levkowetz
Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git … Paul Wouters
Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc license file and git … Henrik Levkowetz