IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatracker

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1726120B43 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:24:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtXVl4a8MqvZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:24:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21055120B41 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:24:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAIKO4dX048403 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:24:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1574108645; bh=qaphkvJsTX4359pVeF0uiYukrUnitOCRCgKkJcopFGk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=pw6cb+/zHOE1FLf2wL3tsWehj62MOqzJ3mdqotdjgacn6+TzNt96pabZU3A38+VuV XdGindQmjATe6TVWjao9GY2+d9xMjwJhyPiMA7dkOeFVBlrB0CnyFK4iG5I7jbwXhw GWRUCivvT/rfFvu2y8FUYP1T+eXI79YBPL938ntM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <18512.1574107042@dooku.sandelman.ca>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <560990cf-c76f-add2-ed38-1a741601ec32@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:24:04 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <18512.1574107042@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FEF0305EC59FB6748A875E18"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/A4HBQ1-_vDUMLX2OYfW_Kh0yAg8>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:24:08 -0000

On 11/18/19 1:57 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Hi, my understanding is that xml2rfc.ietf.org is just a redirect to
> tools.ietf.org, and is not yet supported.
>
> Meanwhile, the datatracker.ietf.org is supported, and now are doing XML as
> primary submission format, and that involves the datatracker reaching out to
> xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org to run xml2rfc.
> So, if xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org is down, or is missing a generated
> reference. file,  then I can't submit documents via the datatracker.
>
> (Or I have to submit .txt files, perhaps, which I don't know if I do
> programmatically)
>
> What is the plan to rationalize this support situation?

The datatracker has its own instance of xml2rfc installed locally (see 
the requirements.txt file).

When you submit through the datatracker, that local instance is used. 
The datatracker does not call out to tools.ietf.org.

RjS

>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email