IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho suggestion: "no mic" and "no video" choices

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 18 March 2024 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4ECC14F5F7; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNfNfpWekCsV; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A0CC14F618; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1rm1O6-0007lC-Oq; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 21:02:02 -0400
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 21:01:57 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <3DD8BDF3BF25FE407B7C9A6D@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <C83A7AAE-C26E-4CD5-905B-5EBA08BD93F9@akamai.com>
References: <B145D960-E548-4983-AEF3-0EFD52E480B9@akamai.com> <8262E363-D919-4325-91F5-02312E9AA5E5@tzi.org> <C83A7AAE-C26E-4CD5-905B-5EBA08BD93F9@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/AtMQ_hgaMGvc9tOVoDRrDT0PQDY>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho suggestion: "no mic" and "no video" choices
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:02:09 -0000

Rich,

Let me generalize a bit...  It would be useful for several
reasons for Meetecho to make a clear distinction between "on
site" (or "in room" if that is better) and "remote".  That would
allow jiggling some settings (including the one you have
commented on) and would give more information to other
participants and even WG chairs about who is likely to come
charging to the mic and who is more or less far away.

   john


--On Monday, March 18, 2024 00:30 +0000 "Salz, Rich"
<rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>> I just disallow mic/camera access.
>> Seeing no popups.
> 
> But then I have to remember to enable it "next time."
> 
> I think realizing folks use you full web-app while onsite
> happens, and there are probably going to be other related
> ideas that come up.
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org -
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email