Re: [Tools-discuss] Submitting Documents to IESG

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9EC14F74F; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.069, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eH9mzty23FbH; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB45EC157B39; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 23TITAdQ025792 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:29:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1651256951; bh=B/bV4m+FDdhaA0+VVSRx3M6uwAn2S/4ZV8CyK9UWsWg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=FpJyGH6Tzzdinpv18hR7ciWf41C2OKrsC+FKS0i0v57a0xUIC6sp6P1xVluDakJsf PfuWDBbpwi/XDhOw6teI5VyfO4pcoqVXEN4NfYlr26smGUh74Wu+S35kBFa+EYmxLm fyHb97huEeQmIytBLlF/gBeEx+csLM6a/sQD54/k=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------kDj7Wjv1ttca2JeRYzlci3I9"
Message-ID: <cc03cac5-0b74-2492-2c91-2512158b35ec@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:29:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <BYAPR18MB269602E9B53D5487E4189B0AC1FC9@BYAPR18MB2696.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <FEDD172D-3AD5-4275-A169-633C2400F2D2@cisco.com> <DDA95695-5431-4FF5-BF6B-481347178C69@gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDA95695-5431-4FF5-BF6B-481347178C69@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/BULstZ2ESCu6YiKtTrjge4xmR5A>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Submitting Documents to IESG
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:29:21 -0000

Send me a bit more detail directly please?

On 4/29/22 1:11 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> Adding tools-discuss to this thread.
>
>> On Apr 29, 2022, at 11:02 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) 
>> <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Keyur,
>> Yup – no error, the document just stays in WG Last Call state. I 
>> optimistically thought that it had worked but that was not the case.
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/
>> Thanks
>> Acee
>> *From:*WGChairs <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Keyur Patel 
>> <keyur@arrcus.com>
>> *Date:*Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:57 PM
>> *To:*"wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:*Submitting Documents to IESG
>> Hi Chairs,
>> We are having troubles submitting documents to IESG with the new 
>> datatracker. Anyone seeing similar issues?😊
>> Best Regards,
>> Keyur
>
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list -Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to:datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to:webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to:ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe):https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss