IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 27 February 2020 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1303A0E12 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5xdd0ftLyCcT for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FA33A0DF8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p548DC4D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.196.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48T7252L3cz105P; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:41:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <36ad6759-0bce-ad05-d42c-abdd2083781c@bluepopcorn.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:41:32 +0100
Cc: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 604536092.7544039-6ee089335d5e40af2fb4981e99a25b69
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8A4D0737-333F-4801-85DA-3FA07D8C9767@tzi.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com> <9898.1574329972@dooku.sandelman.ca> <A7C5D382-FDE4-4EB7-9463-FB2E0884920C@tzi.org> <96dbab15-2b11-4114-8ad0-690047430d68@nostrum.com> <DB2BE9AA-1018-44B0-B926-AF27427B4577@tzi.org> <0C8935E8-7693-4FAE-85DF-33408D297F15@tzi.org> <7f34680e-4fe8-cf17-a0e9-d3696d509a6f@nostrum.com> <73AA0A63-585C-4612-9995-D9CAF79F79FD@tzi.org> <36ad6759-0bce-ad05-d42c-abdd2083781c@bluepopcorn.net>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/DjSri8hyNHqDsAtc3wxgMSOfZSw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:41:38 -0000

On 2020-02-27, at 22:20, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:
> 
> SPF does have a "hardfail" policy, but just about
> nobody actually rejects mail

I would have thought that, but I now know better…

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email