Re: [Tools-discuss] [Cellar] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.txt

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D289120105; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Tz11E5EpcO2; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50C4120025; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:63513 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1iMcQ7-0005M8-AB; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:28:43 -0700
To: Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <157167166904.31800.14436237517062444902@ietfa.amsl.com> <2259.1571680217@localhost> <ECF02FF9-B2F3-4493-89B8-3B31777D4990@dericed.com>
Cc: cellar@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <7d488832-92f7-5e8c-896f-d4a3bb3ada61@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ECF02FF9-B2F3-4493-89B8-3B31777D4990@dericed.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ptLoU8KVSwCl7oBJ4xObAT0v5In8IGXGN"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, cellar@ietf.org, mcr@sandelman.ca, dave@dericed.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/DpenyJPSOclxPbmAkrl1UuiE1_Y>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Cellar] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:28:46 -0000

Hi Dave,

On 2019-10-21 20:22, Dave Rice wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
>> On Oct 21, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca 
>> <mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dave, is ebml in XML v3, uploaded as such?
> 
> It was uploaded via https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/.
> 
>> Were the txt and HTML generated by you or the datatracker?
> 
> With xml2rfc 2.32.0 locally the files look ok, I’m attaching them.
> 
> I haven’t tested but in the XML within the <sourcecode> we have 0x0A for line 
> breaks. I wonder if an 0x0d (carriage return) would make a difference, though I 
> feel guilty using up version numbers just to test that.

Using 0x0D will not make a difference.

I've run into this for at least one other draft, and I believe that the
upcoming new datatracker release deployment will pull in the latest xml2rfc
and address this.

I will do some additional testing in my dev copy, though.


Best regards,

	Henrik

>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12
>>
>> looking at the diff of the txt, there are a bunch of relative references which 
>> did not
>> get expanded correctly from the markdown:
>>
>>    unknownsizeallowed attribute (#unknownsizeallowed)).
> 
> I’ll address that separately.
> 
>> Looks like a tooling issue somewhere.
>> Looking at this:
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.html
>>
>> I don't see #unknownsizeallowed in the same way, but the reference that is
>> generated looks off to me.
>>
>> --
>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
>> ] mcr@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca> http://www.sandelman.ca/        | 
>>   ruby on rails    [
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>