IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] datatracker not showing draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy in ANIMA documents

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Mon, 11 March 2024 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235EBC14F71A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zlGFVvsMw2_s for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39851C14F712 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TtqV75v4lznkLD; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:22:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4TtqV756Yszkn4q; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:22:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:22:07 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, mjethanandani@gmail.com
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Ze91_5ZIuCBhPjlH@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <Ze9SHYO8Uyf2ZrUM@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <87710d27-d3ff-4360-8fbc-b2f02215de7d@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87710d27-d3ff-4360-8fbc-b2f02215de7d@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/GYKrbPWMa198Cx8QkG2eLJgd4xU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] datatracker not showing draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy in ANIMA documents
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:22:18 -0000

Thanks. This is now actively being worked on after we had to effectively park it due to
higher priority docs, and it already went to AD review and required document update.

Cc'ing Mahesh, who is going to take over from Rob.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:18:03PM -0500, Robert Sparks wrote:
> 
> On 3/11/24 1:49 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy/
> > 
> > does not show up in
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/documents/
> > 
> > One idue is that it was passed to our AD for AD review (passed) but then hold to be able to
> > still fix up issues if those would arise from related documents (as it can not move forward without
> > dependencies anyhow). (IESG-State: I-D Exists (IESG: Dead)).
> > 
> > If this is the case, i'll ask AD to re-adjust status. If it's soemthing else, pls. let me know.
> 
> A state if IESG: dead will definitely cause the document to not appear on
> the list.
> 
> What's curious is that it was a System action that marked it IESG dead (when
> the draft expired).
> 
> The right thing to do is to move it back to iesg state id-exists. Rob, you
> can do that, or I can do it for you - let me know.
> 
> RjS
> 
> > 
> > Cheers
> >      Toerless
> > 
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email