[Tools-discuss] non wg drafts reported in wg draft list

"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Tue, 19 June 2012 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5B621F85C3; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIMsBAdIs1IN; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E07C21F8526; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5JG5gmD005652; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:05:42 -0500
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5JG5deu007008; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:05:39 -0500
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([2002:9db9:506b::9db9:506b]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([2002:9db9:506b::9db9:506b]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:05:22 -0400
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: "ietf-action@ietf.org" <ietf-action@ietf.org>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: non wg drafts reported in wg draft list
Thread-Index: Ac1ONFAaxg88On1YThiPVrjT3eZFfA==
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:05:20 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F2858C@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Tools-discuss] non wg drafts reported in wg draft list
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:05:44 -0000

On the http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/, two personal drafts are listed in the Active Internet-Drafts list.  Their states are correctly shown as "Adopted by a WG".  The wg drafts that were the result of adoption are also listed, with the correct state of "WG Document".

The two personal drafts are:

draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01
draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00

and the wg draft replacements are

draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-00
draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-00

Did I do something that made this happen?  If so, can you tell me so I prevent it happening again?  If I did not make this happen, could it be fixed? (I.e., remove the personal drafts from the Active list and retain the wg drafts)

Similarly, I noted a while ago that the tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr page lists draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying under Active drafts.  It also lists the official wg draft draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying replacement under Active drafts.  Both draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying and draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl should be listed under "Related Active Documents", with notes that they are replaced by draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying (for draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying) and draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl (for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01).

OK?

--Sandy