Re: [Tools-discuss] Reference to NIST document

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Mon, 21 June 2021 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9053A2AF3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 03:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMYI9KXruOKl; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 03:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC5FF3A2AF2; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 03:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-B5A8DC24-E8EC-4F90-90A8-22940885C8FD"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 22:04:48 +1200
Message-Id: <5FE46BE5-8D72-4A1B-B69D-D2C3DA174885@ietf.org>
References: <20210619221722.969211422198@ary.qy>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210619221722.969211422198@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18F72)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/IBH7-h9_qWvyMimw1wzsI3G2bHE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Reference to NIST document
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:04:57 -0000

Double reply below. 

> On 20/06/2021, at 10:17 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Here is the RFP:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/media/documents/BibXML_Service_RFP.pdf
> 
> Looks like they should be selecting the contractor shortly.
> 

Yes we are on track for announcing a contractor soon. 

> On 20/06/2021, at 9:41 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> The idea is so great Mark Nottingham has started something…
>> https://www.specref.org
> 
> oh, that's very nice.
> It seems like the IETF should renovate to use that tool.

We have to do it ourselves because BibXML is ‘proprietary’ to the IETF. i.e. while we publish it as an open standard, albeit not a standalone one, nobody else uses it. 

The intent of the RFP is to provide access to our references and those of select other organisations in four ways (basically what we already have but rewritten and modernised):
- web api
- interactive web form, single citation
- interactive web form, full datasets for those that can be statically generated
- rsync, for those sets that can be statically generated 

This makes it easy for a site such as specref.org to pull our files and republish.  They don’t need permission but we will help to make it happen. 

In addition to specref.org you might also be interested in ISO 690 and relaton.org. 

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director