Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc, and BCP references
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 03 March 2017 18:48 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A700A1294F7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fl0P-IFEtxbv for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCD312998D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v23ImMsB018025; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:48:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vZdVZ1Bh3zDJ41; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:48:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <19529.1488562595@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 19:48:21 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 510259701.632065-d9df15e5f88ca272ea8e7e09c25e1c29
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B0764D5-FDFB-4153-B797-C2D4C357A947@tzi.org>
References: <19529.1488562595@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/JxF_6xLUSzJ1zilBeE2w5dbjU8I>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc, and BCP references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 18:48:32 -0000
On 3 Mar 2017, at 18:36, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Shouldn't I be able to reference BCPs (and STDs) this way? Yes. RFCXML v2 (RFC7749) didn’t provide a way to reference multiple RFCs (which may be what a BCP/STD is composed of) in one go. RFCXML v3 (RFC7791) does. So I would expect the bibliography libraries to catch up here. (It is just not clear to me who will hold the tab.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc, and BCP references Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc, and BCP references Carsten Bormann