IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Step backwards: <noreply@ietf.org>

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Wed, 13 March 2019 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AF1130ECE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93Yeh2VD9jAK for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FD4130EC6 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.126.190] (unknown [IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:f0e3:3b9d:c477:243d]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3512221A6C; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:41:16 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1552466478; bh=W6UaKe3hLeT597c/tIAnYR/JpyaCLk1UMykAEb4j5TA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mSScEGr8vX1+q0uPSxa/UMRsYOVw+sPKwtOBwX3a1VL0jt5C/anCq759LjDIVUC04 fHfdImhEpW+17NwYrVpAazycR/c4XI5FyW1/tT2IZQU+ThwvSWR2FeUSRPYQOp/pBF SVOQxsEOgxLn4Gs2IgNvd75vwN7ZgpQU7DZgTAnE=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:41:13 +0900
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5597)
Message-ID: <D3D44861-8E40-4B62-8001-27DC4F83ACE2@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <5eee9abc-4919-d3f3-9d5c-ec05823cf479@levkowetz.com>
References: <186f4ff4-e31e-80c6-600f-9521694734f0@gmail.com> <656168f7-ed79-e19e-ea73-433cd9b49994@levkowetz.com> <AF03E2FC-A1F4-4585-B40F-9A263035D7BC@frobbit.se> <5eee9abc-4919-d3f3-9d5c-ec05823cf479@levkowetz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_17EE1467-0279-4AE9-AF53-66A2605BE0F2_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/KiGpjjrcqvIviY021PqnuvL4X3s>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Step backwards: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:41:24 -0000

On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:57, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

> Brian is talking about a recent change away from a practice where when a reviewer would enter his review into the datatracker, it would originate a mail purporting to be from <reviewer@reviewers.domain>, and send that out from the server mail.ietf.org, which is not mentioned in the SPF record of reviewers.domain.
>
> Since this was becoming increasingly troublesome, as more and more domains were adopting stricter SPF settings, we've stopped sending mail purporting to be sent by <reviewer@reviewers.domain>, and are now sending from <noreply@ietf.org>, but we missed adding a Reply-To:
> header field that would make replies work as before.

Fun fun fun, multiple interacting interesting bits in the tussle!

Thanks for untangling the bits!

   paf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email