Re: [Tools-discuss] #codesprint slack channel

worley@ariadne.com Sat, 01 August 2020 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1C93A109F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67NKou1R3jHb for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34043A109C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.98]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 1hYWkSRdQLdfa1hawkDgVU; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 02:49:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1596250198; bh=/75eFcg4gNaPVH7KrLXRfVRmAi1o/To6xmdEJtVLBwo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=HFQQErXUSMvBzNEQqoaSG60Ld8Twf5Ol1WC2YbkszIhwvHqFwj6oiBYl0PRNsJkwZ KwopVS0ELS4nQvcPxfwFytTUmfyN4P6ECVP84TH7e/r4jdccZfhxGIiz5fug5KBI9X g4yebLKHn5Gm3Z+tjfQfBKiPJ0LzdEugOwZLrk/qMQsPSZViw2Hx6/302PmoQm2zwt A6ATkEKJp56I3FabQQOqb2jS8oG3fOBfEfKkLJ5izSsuecUWG4MOWnYn9uK37nNFBt wzQD3Gu0Vdo1cp3TCQFkZck3oKz5bBo4XSQjw19F7dH/zBxd1fhlP96GMCt8h8VO8a fy5M00KRK4hxA==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id 1hajkRTSEty8d1haskqmbQ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 02:49:57 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0716nWtZ010404; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 02:49:32 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 0716nVIH010396; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 02:49:31 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: lars@eggert.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <E89C6A34-7ED2-4475-BD48-970D3495445E@bangj.com> (pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 02:49:31 -0400
Message-ID: <87mu3eyi6c.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/LuIPC69LPkwoR4Kx2uR7lmoiA1M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] #codesprint slack channel
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 02:50:01 -0000

Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> writes:
> I don't need another thing to join. Is this archived somewhere? Why
> not use the mailing list?

Well, a Slack channel is better for real-time discussions among
participants *during* a code sprint.

Dale