Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits not ignoring tombstones?

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Mon, 14 December 2009 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451643A686E for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id baj3SnO34Osf for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EFC3A686B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h-209-11.a212.priv.bahnhof.se ([85.24.209.11]:56133) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1NKK1l-0003Nj-GU; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:08:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4B26C56C.6030508@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:08:28 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
References: <4B268587.5030508@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B268587.5030508@dial.pipex.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.24.209.11
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: elwynd@dial.pipex.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:09:26 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits not ignoring tombstones?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:08:46 -0000

Hi Elwyn,

On 2009-12-14 19:35 Elwyn Davies said the following:
> Hi.
> 
> I updated a draft today using xml2rfc bibxml3 repository and then ran
> idnits.  I got the following warnings:
>>   Checking references for intended status: Informational
>>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>   == Outdated reference: A later version (-22) exists of
>>      draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-21
>>
>>   == Outdated reference: A later version (-06) exists of
>>      draft-cordeiro-nsis-hypath-05
>>
>>   == Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of
>>      draft-manner-nsis-gist-dccp-00
>>
>>   == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
>>      draft-manner-nsis-nslp-auth-04
>>
>>   == Outdated reference: A later version (-02) exists of
>>      draft-manner-nsis-peering-data-01
> It looks to me as if several of these are incorrect - the most recent
> versions are 'tombstones' for expired drafts in some cases
> (draft-cordeiro and draft-manner-nsis-gist at least).  Isn't idnits
> supposed to ignore tombstones?

It is, indeed.  I'll have a look at the drafts above, and fix as needed.

Regards,

	Henrik