Re: [Tools-discuss] Tool for marking a personal document as replaced by a WG doc?

Paul Hoffman <> Thu, 11 April 2013 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F320021F8F41 for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fYOlxLvEZ-q for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584B521F8D8D for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3BFGrde056048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:16:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:16:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Robert Sparks <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Tool for marking a personal document as replaced by a WG doc?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:16:56 -0000

On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Robert Sparks <> wrote:

> On 4/11/13 8:43 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> Greetings again. Last year, Robert Sparks was meant to put on the Tools Team request list an item to make it so that we chairs could mark an I-D in the Datatracker as having been replaced by a WG document. However, I don't see such a tool at <>. Did the tool get created?
> No Paul - that's still an outstanding request. For the moment, chairs still need to send email to the secretary to capture that relation.
> I'm not finding the corresponding ticket quickly though - I'll keep digging and create a new one if necessary. If you can send me a pointer to our earlier conversation, I'd appreciate it (so I can be sure I captured the entire idea correctly).

Thread on wg-chairs from last year titled "What should happen when a WG adopts an individual I-D?"

--Paul Hoffman