[Tools-discuss] Glitch? [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 12 February 2021 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC73A0D29 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wb7PZusEKeZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE203A0D00 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id s15so380866plr.9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Kch4P4qmOBfRuhHHpGGn5nOMQ3bBQ1egChliW/8I4k=; b=GZTYsvexM4UoGbNOBV4QZt80x+4v3+6OvXDZzrz7mS7+BkO/Sfhig7HGzrm/7z+ZLm pD6P3e4z5z8DOEXrB9Rx1v3sKDxJ9+uGnugYBpDShauHui2JWBuRICbEGK2quh27LLCn okbVz9cLUc9BGmyC1uEpGi0SHez0Z9O18MWRDWEzlg9m+HsjA419IL9RlVg+duNNA+Du yIWXpySOOgBYSM2Y87fk4mIirQxBXcWPwSoSFQdcxjRc2+9HLYsiQshm440kQiIDabSf RSQWcJZ78NCYM1dGbeb0otj4Bf2EXlte9Qi4RucyndAupZEjKduP5M+WAahCJTsLQJrS 4iig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Kch4P4qmOBfRuhHHpGGn5nOMQ3bBQ1egChliW/8I4k=; b=Sde81sxGFG5xWNbn6KTykUjU4fhqUbtPSp9Ctc4agNbncWQ+1rZrPx2nKpHYesJxzi 70Udj2LXBs9m7vzclo/+1og7F7ZOI1IA+cfrKyC1AwP4YkCMs5ME3+W/fFnG2zW8pqRg 4fMes/ZgJsPSspZ7KUAjyTrAyHg+iS7Uz4sb3yxB8QPwoD0it1ptE+t1UZmgUxYtsDIN ZxVeXjaUpxiDTbZij02YNfxoQB9LuVfVPVU01B+3LMdOChqBJ5z3hIcVqEL6K8YgkEZi TnYnSx4wJAldm10X0JwF2K03corjjz8SYE0dHLRm2OFvCgTS7a9WDOjVbgG3bcAleG+o sLaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VqMqdfHWcAHtOxQj5bGkAGaKgT6nxKhTNv8oFOoKHkJEjRO01 lXG0E8iLgrBx2QAPkin1bu6xG6b663N4Pw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgF+F0kL0HQW+2Vz2+XHVq82vlm6ysdaQ8xYrvU/dWCR9Cw5LytLZMGZILeGke4Yov9YKWoA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1244:: with SMTP id gx4mr4016588pjb.187.1613158949413; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm8538998pjz.16.2021.02.12.11.42.26 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:28 -0800 (PST)
References: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <8f56fc98-7984-f2c4-3b7c-4b11dc6337e1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:42:24 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ZID1X53FJCLTAz3V8SYx79reAVo>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Glitch? [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:42:33 -0000

> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24

Well, no, there isn't and I've seen this problem for several other recent drafts too.

There seems to be an ongoing glitch.

   Brian

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:50:14 -0800
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: opsec@ietf.org


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks
        Authors         : Eric Vyncke
                          Kiran Kumar
                          Merike Kaeo
                          Enno Rey
	Filename        : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt
	Pages           : 56
	Date            : 2021-02-12

Abstract:
   Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
   available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
   network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
   4942 describes the security issues in the protocol, but network
   managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
   enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.

   This document analyzes the operational security issues associated
   with several types of network and proposes technical and procedural
   mitigation techniques.  This document is only applicable to managed
   networks, such as enterprise building networks.  The recommendations
   in this document are not applicable to residential user cases, even
   in cases where a Service Provider may be managing the home gateway.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt