[Tools-discuss] Glitch? [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt]
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 12 February 2021 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC73A0D29 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wb7PZusEKeZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE203A0D00 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id s15so380866plr.9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Kch4P4qmOBfRuhHHpGGn5nOMQ3bBQ1egChliW/8I4k=; b=GZTYsvexM4UoGbNOBV4QZt80x+4v3+6OvXDZzrz7mS7+BkO/Sfhig7HGzrm/7z+ZLm pD6P3e4z5z8DOEXrB9Rx1v3sKDxJ9+uGnugYBpDShauHui2JWBuRICbEGK2quh27LLCn okbVz9cLUc9BGmyC1uEpGi0SHez0Z9O18MWRDWEzlg9m+HsjA419IL9RlVg+duNNA+Du yIWXpySOOgBYSM2Y87fk4mIirQxBXcWPwSoSFQdcxjRc2+9HLYsiQshm440kQiIDabSf RSQWcJZ78NCYM1dGbeb0otj4Bf2EXlte9Qi4RucyndAupZEjKduP5M+WAahCJTsLQJrS 4iig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Kch4P4qmOBfRuhHHpGGn5nOMQ3bBQ1egChliW/8I4k=; b=Sde81sxGFG5xWNbn6KTykUjU4fhqUbtPSp9Ctc4agNbncWQ+1rZrPx2nKpHYesJxzi 70Udj2LXBs9m7vzclo/+1og7F7ZOI1IA+cfrKyC1AwP4YkCMs5ME3+W/fFnG2zW8pqRg 4fMes/ZgJsPSspZ7KUAjyTrAyHg+iS7Uz4sb3yxB8QPwoD0it1ptE+t1UZmgUxYtsDIN ZxVeXjaUpxiDTbZij02YNfxoQB9LuVfVPVU01B+3LMdOChqBJ5z3hIcVqEL6K8YgkEZi TnYnSx4wJAldm10X0JwF2K03corjjz8SYE0dHLRm2OFvCgTS7a9WDOjVbgG3bcAleG+o sLaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VqMqdfHWcAHtOxQj5bGkAGaKgT6nxKhTNv8oFOoKHkJEjRO01 lXG0E8iLgrBx2QAPkin1bu6xG6b663N4Pw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgF+F0kL0HQW+2Vz2+XHVq82vlm6ysdaQ8xYrvU/dWCR9Cw5LytLZMGZILeGke4Yov9YKWoA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1244:: with SMTP id gx4mr4016588pjb.187.1613158949413; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm8538998pjz.16.2021.02.12.11.42.26 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:42:28 -0800 (PST)
References: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <8f56fc98-7984-f2c4-3b7c-4b11dc6337e1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:42:24 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <161314501469.27869.17507298108361538056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ZID1X53FJCLTAz3V8SYx79reAVo>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Glitch? [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:42:33 -0000
> There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24 Well, no, there isn't and I've seen this problem for several other recent drafts too. There seems to be an ongoing glitch. Brian -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:50:14 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org CC: opsec@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF. Title : Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks Authors : Eric Vyncke Kiran Kumar Merike Kaeo Enno Rey Filename : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24.txt Pages : 56 Date : 2021-02-12 Abstract: Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal network. However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges. RFC 4942 describes the security issues in the protocol, but network managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices. This document analyzes the operational security issues associated with several types of network and proposes technical and procedural mitigation techniques. This document is only applicable to managed networks, such as enterprise building networks. The recommendations in this document are not applicable to residential user cases, even in cases where a Service Provider may be managing the home gateway. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
- [Tools-discuss] Glitch? [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-i… Brian E Carpenter