Re: [Tools-discuss] Time/Deadline tracking tool?

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 20 December 2005 13:12 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EohHq-00025t-Ra; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:12:14 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EohHo-00025K-HY for tools-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:12:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24276 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:11:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EohK8-0003Fw-EV for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:14:38 -0500
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBKDBfci058246 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:11:43 GMT
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jBKDBfIC205648 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:11:41 GMT
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBKDBePQ028509 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:11:41 GMT
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBKDBeEe028504; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:11:40 GMT
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-252-10.de.ibm.com [9.145.252.10]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA36122; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:11:39 +0100
Message-ID: <43A8030A.90003@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:11:38 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Time/Deadline tracking tool?
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2401F54C39@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2401F54C39@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: fenner@research.att.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

The *very* long tail is indeed mainly very special cases, and is
mainly a concern because it skews the mean value. So percentiles
are the way to go; we could regard the 50th percentile as a key
indicator for example.

     Brian

Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote:
> I like the idea. Maybe the prediction could be a probability 
> distribution as well?
> 
> Something like "25% of documents go from WGLC to RFC in <=X1 months,
> 50% in <=X2 months, 75% in <=X3 months"?  This way, the horribly 
> long tail wouldn't skew the figures so much, and you could pick 
> either an optimistic or pessimistic estimate depending on the
> document and your mood :-)
> 
> Speaking about the long tail....
> 
> o  draft-ietf-rsvp-proxy has been in AD Evaluation :: 
>    Revised ID Needed (jpeterson) for 1082 days
> o  draft-ietf-megaco-h248v2 has been in Publication Requested :: 
>    External Party (jpeterson) for 928 days
> o  draft-bradner-pbk-frame has been in IESG Evaluation :: 
>    Revised ID Needed (rhousley) for 891 days
> o  draft-polk-ieprep-flow-model-considerations has been in 
>    AD Evaluation :: External Party (jpeterson) for 698 days
> o  draft-rajeshkumar-mmusic-gpmd has been in IESG Evaluation :: 
>    External Party (jpeterson) for 667 days
> o  draft-ietf-imapext-sort has been in IESG Evaluation :: 
>    AD Followup (sah) for 640 days
> o  draft-hardie-bounded-longest-match has been in AD Evaluation :: 
>    External Party (azinin) for 629 days
> o  draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3-as has been in Waiting for 
>    Writeup (fenner) for 520 days
> o  draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3 has been in Waiting for 
>    Writeup (fenner) for 520 days
> o  draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis has been in IESG Evaluation :: 
>    AD Followup (becarpenter) for 516 days
> o  draft-ietf-ips-scsi-mib has been in Expert Review :: 
>    AD Followup (mankin) for 516 days
> 
> :-)
> 
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> 


_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss