Re: [Tools-discuss] suggestion for id-draft diff tool

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Fri, 05 August 2005 18:32 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E16zZ-00047t-2G; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:32:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E16zX-00047o-9X for tools-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:32:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA24865 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 14:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.184]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E17We-0007eP-3N for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:06:38 -0400
Received: by av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7FB6E37EF9; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:32:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B60637E8F; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:32:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-224-201-50-no45.tbcn.telia.com [81.224.201.50]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B408337E43; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:32:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=henrik) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E16zE-0006Lx-0p; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:32:05 +0200
Message-ID: <42F3B09C.9030504@levkowetz.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:31:56 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] suggestion for id-draft diff tool
References: <42F23629.8020108@att.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508041839420.5348@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508041839420.5348@netcore.fi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Cc: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1780525062=="
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

on 2005-08-04 17:42 Pekka Savola said the following:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Tony Hansen wrote:
>> One way to accomplish this would be to let the author or WG chair
>> indicate the relationship between a document and an earlier document
>> with a different name. For example, the I-D submission tool could let
>> such a field be filled in whenever a -00 document is submitted. Links
>> between older documents could be added through a link on the wg draft
>> tool page.
> 
> Actually, you can even tell the secretariat which drafts obsolete the 
> others, and this info is available from the tracker (look for e.g., 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview).

Yes, where the tracker has this information, I also have it available
as a list of drafts which are replaced by other drafts.  I'll add code
to look for this to the draft pages.  Good idea.

Already today, when a -00 document is submitted, it is possible to tell
the secretariat that it replaces an earlier document, and that information
will be recorded.  However, not all authors or chairs know that this is
possible, and thus don't use it.

For the I-D submission tool, it is a good idea to have a "replaces" field
for -00 documents, and that is actually already part of the requirements.


	Henrik
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss