IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 28 November 2019 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECE4120108 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:56:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imHHyRL0fVHp for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8EA01200C1 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0013.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0013.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47PF044QvCzyyV for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:56:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E108430-4DFA-4DA7-9608-2A7A60F7490C"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 596678161.893012-daf5c5352fb94b19126f6e635180f1b8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <A84B6FB5-2035-4BCB-8C86-F9CD1C7CEFAA@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:56:04 +0100
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/bOOzkZab8f1U6SH4mTQwDGS79TQ>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:56:07 -0000

> I'm hoping Henrik or Robert can shed light on the current and planned
> implementation of this.

This is getting a bit long in the tooth; I’d also like to be able to use the draft…@ietf.org aliases but now realistically can’t with more strict SPF checks being implemented everywhere.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email