IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 14 June 2019 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6F612004B for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLK4QPzKAWEF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B7212000E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E977380BE; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D8E3BFD8; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7729F2F; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <B97AF188-5ADF-41FE-870A-DED7BFB9E51B@amsl.com>
References: <20190612150100.84AF538185@tuna.sandelman.ca> <31204.1560354351@localhost> <b2d9819e-9174-590e-6de0-ab557e28bd6b@levkowetz.com> <13329.1560365123@localhost> <c1c2f69b-cf24-c6ab-6dcd-1c0dbc907bd0@levkowetz.com> <CBDC4F38-7984-4171-95AE-C05C4A74D07C@tzi.org> <9de6bcc1-2965-eeb0-a200-5581867db81b@levkowetz.com> <8203EB90-A7D1-41E4-98E6-310B339A2941@gmail.com> <B97AF188-5ADF-41FE-870A-DED7BFB9E51B@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:05:07 -0400
Message-ID: <15869.1560470707@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/hdKN5kSHOmJP_oh4iX4T3cay7DI>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:05:13 -0000

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:
    > the underlying addresses become stale with the existing aliases, what
    > happens?  Do you have a method for keeping them up to date?

I think that rfc-editor website could likely pull the data from DT
using the API.

    > Michael, just curious - what’s your use case for this?  Currently on
    > the info pages, we have text suggesting the user email the WG if they
    > want to discuss the RFC; for example, this is what appears for RFC
    > 7030:

The RFC7030 WG, PKIX, is pretty much closed.
While I actually know the authors, I felt it was more appropriate to use the
alias.   I don't really know if the authors are on the list either.

    > Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to pkix@ietf.org
    > <mailto:pkix@ietf.org?subject=Question%20regarding%20RFC%207030>

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email