IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 June 2019 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2C120123 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEEaMFbh7fG0 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5AFC1200C1 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B7380BE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:44:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 4C9D0F4A; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C2191B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20190612150100.84AF538185@tuna.sandelman.ca>
References: <20190612150100.84AF538185@tuna.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:45:51 -0400
Message-ID: <31204.1560354351@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ojELMO-cJkYvun1Wurohzr6_5xg>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] emailing authors of an RFC
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:45:57 -0000

The page at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7030/ has an email button
that generates:
     draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org

is this correct? (That was the correct draft name).
mail.ietf.org, says:
    <draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org>: host mail.ietf.org[4.31.198.44] said: 550 5.1.1

could this be because this draft predates having contact addresses?
Is this because the draft has been published, but we don't update the email
contacts, or...?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email