[Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standard port

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 04 March 2020 13:54 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 $3608.60.0.2.5$)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <001501d5f1da$5dd28560$19779020$@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:54:05 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CD83F639-5444-4635-923D-02477C815617@tzi.org>
References: <D3D93195-242A-4575-99F9-BAFEC1D6AF0A@iii.ca> <2DF5AEC2-9044-42C5-B043-5244950D6D0B@encrypted.net> <20200304023523.GA36359@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <001501d5f1da$5dd28560$19779020$@acm.org>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ioyDIaOTrBJpo2PviV4igj-CDaU>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standard port
Precedence: list

On 2020-03-04, at 05:07, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/ManyCouches

Uh oh, that thing redirects to port 9009 now.
That is not going to work with many firewalls.

(Also:
pichat             9009        tcp    Pichat Server                [Mark_Seuffert]                                       [Mark_Seuffert]                                           2004-11
pichat             9009        udp    Pichat Server                [Mark_Seuffert]                                       [Mark_Seuffert]                                           2004-11
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pichat will not be familiar to many firewall admins, nor considered desired traffic if it is.)fn

(Ceterum Censeo: I think hackmd/CodiMD is a more appropriate tool for the 2020s.)

Grüße, Carsten

[Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standard po… Carsten Bormann
Re: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standar… Glen
Re: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standar… Carsten Bormann
Re: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad no longer on standar… Yaron Sheffer