Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-rph-new-namespaces-03.txt
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 23 October 2008 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5DF3A6867; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E183A6867 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZbK4IDttwss for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9285C3A67A3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,472,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="110711753"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2008 21:37:29 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9NLbRn4011532; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:27 -0700
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NLbP1Y005622; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:37:26 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-RTP-202CWjv3tnR0000069a@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
References: <48EFBECB.9070801@ericsson.com> <XFE-RTP-201jQxzmWec00000627@xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com> <5383F395-82E8-4D4C-9B56-AA30C3699D16@cisco.com> <XFE-RTP-202CWjv3tnR0000069a@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <65702617-AA94-4D0C-B00D-3E38399FB067@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:37:20 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3669; t=1224797847; x=1225661847; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Gen-ART=20review=20of=20draft-ietf-sip- rph-new-namespaces-03.txt |Sender:=20; bh=xqUShYt6oAxnj/azDLVidRmoRjfw8yHvO2WTmvgsBNU=; b=gahOBBC7NoGyttGYH24Ttufvcux0qqP6YtP9R3Vjfv3MmQha0yPKTa8Xy7 RE56x0CfHGrl9WDC6wqKvqhfdu7OTDVNLsRiwrIiZ4myl58z5xB7wI4geszU QsoOG8UW7d;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: James M Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-rph-new-namespaces-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, not sure that anyone needs to reply to this but I wanted you to be aware of issues some folks where having .... On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:09 AM, James M. Polk wrote: > At 11:24 AM 10/21/2008, Cullen Jennings wrote: > >> On Oct 20, 2008, at 4:00 PM, James M. Polk wrote: >> >>> Now, that said - should I submit -04 with these minor changes before >>> Thursday's meeting? >>> >>> The changes are mostly deletions, with 3 or 4 other parts that I >>> changed a word or two. >>> >>> I also corrected the middle 20 namespaces listed at the beginning of >>> section 2. >>> >>> I'm waiting until someone tells me to do something >> >> If you can get the new version in today or tomorrow, please do that. > > I'm trying - but the tool isn't letting me submit the ID. First the > tool tells me I don't have a submission date, or it is in the wrong > format. Then, when I submit it manually (by adjusting the meta-data > for the date ) it claims I need to put my given and family name in > the ID before it will accept my submission. Gee, I didn't think I > had to tell any reader who wrote the doc... when did that become a > requirement? In the ~240 previous IDs I've submitted it was never a > requirement.... > > grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!! > > I **HATE** that there is no "I want the tool to accept what I've > submitted anyway" button... > > FYI -- here's the first page of the ID, perhaps someone else can > tell me what's wrong with this page (which is preventing this > submission)? > > > SIP Working Group James > Polk > Internet-Draft Cisco > Systems > Expires: April 21st, 2009 October 21, > 2008 > Intended Status: Standards Track (as PS) > > > IANA Registration of New Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) > Resource-Priority Namespaces > draft-ietf-sip-rph-new-namespaces-04.txt > > Status of this Memo > > By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any > applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware > have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes > aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. > > Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering > Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that > other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- > Drafts. > > Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six > months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents > at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as > reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." > > The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at > http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. > > The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. > > This Internet-Draft will expire on April 21, 2009. > > Copyright Notice > > Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). > > Abstract > > This document creates additional Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) > Resource-Priority namespaces to meet the requirements of the US > Defense Information Systems Agency, and places these namespaces in > the IANA registry. > > > > > > > > Polk Expires April 21, 2009 [Page > 1] > Internet-Draft New SIP RPH Namespaces for DISA Oct > 2008 > > > >> Thanks, Cullen > _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-… James M. Polk
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-… James M. Polk