Re: [Tools-discuss] Some oddities on IAB/IESG "WG pages"

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 05 March 2008 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D88D28C763; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVwrIsZ+yxAI; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E643A6BAD; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9728C234 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0UJF4pUv44cR for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5953A6917 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39223 helo=chardonnay.local) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1JWzNr-0003EB-Tj; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:34:35 +0100
Message-ID: <47CEF5C1.3070006@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:34:25 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
References: <alpine.LRH.1.00.0803051710390.8786@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.00.0803051710390.8786@netcore.fi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pekkas@netcore.fi, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Some oddities on IAB/IESG "WG pages"
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1579825042=="
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Pekka,

On 2008-03-05 16:23 Pekka Savola said the following:
> Hi,
> 
> Some observations on IAB/IESG "WG pages":
> 
> http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/iab/ lists only 
> 'draft-iab-dns-choices' under Active drafts, while draft-iab-ip-config 
> and draft-iab-protocol-success are listed as Related drafts.  I'd 
> expect all of them to be listed as active drafts.

So would I.  However, the ietf database lists only the dns-choices
draft as belonging to the iab.  I don't know whether this should be
fixed by maintaining the database better, or by me using some
iab-specific heuristics rather than what's specified in the database
for these...

> Also, at least draft-iab-iwout-report is listed as Expired, even 
> though those should be RFC published (RFC4948 in this case).

Right.  Again, I'll point to the datatracker database being out of
date.  In this case, I do have alternative datasources to use; I'll
do a re-write to use the more direct source for this (i.e., publication
status).

> On http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/, it's not obvious why 
> 'draft-zinin-early-review' is listed as an IESG document.

Well, right.  But guess what I'm going to say here ,;-) ...

That what the ietf database has it classified as ,,:-}


Suggestions for action/improvement?


	Henrik

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss