[Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs
Glen <glen@amsl.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 05:21 UTC
Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C793212096E for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPBlYRmeIPL9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35155120143 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1019E2034B7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:19:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f173.google.com (mail-oi1-f173.google.com [209.85.167.173]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E811A2034B4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f173.google.com with SMTP id l20so2058550oie.10 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAyWLKcT8VTj8O+Wfm8MDN3GjEkkYWFNlcMmVqTDU+BqVXaN5i Zg3B9ob5NP/UlE22xBwM2Jhv32wmvCjrJ+K1tBs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/5CWjDBHGrD+a/CVRvN2QhqXN+IKFipvy58z3V/a0lAZ9HwWmY5BqY+3kBrJjsh/qwVnuq7vMoUSOX6n81jw=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f0c1:: with SMTP id o184mr6212568oih.2.1574313712931; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:21:41 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/lzZX88ku69tp0-YWPtpX8z_0_2Y>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:21:56 -0000
All - I'm redirecting this message from Carsten (who is on this list) out of IETF-Action and onto this list for discussion. I'm hoping Henrik or Robert can shed light on the current and planned implementation of this. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Carsten Bormann Is there a need for the DMARC hack for the chair aliases, too? Grüße, Carsten > Begin forwarded message: > > From: MAILER-DAEMON@ietfa.amsl.com (Mail Delivery System) > Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender > Date: November 21, 2019 at 12:03:35 GMT+8 > To: cabo@tzi.org > > This is the mail system at host ietfa.amsl.com. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > <ietf@augustcellars.com> (expanded from <expand-cbor-chairs@virtual.ietf.org>): > host cloud7.spamtitan.com[52.15.128.102] said: 550 5.7.1 SPF Policy > Rejection t=ietf@augustcellars.com, s=mfrom, id=cabo@tzi.org (in reply to > RCPT TO command) > Reporting-MTA: dns; ietfa.amsl.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 1FA95120951 > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; cabo@tzi.org > Arrival-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:32 -0800 (PST) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; ietf@augustcellars.com > Original-Recipient: rfc822;expand-cbor-chairs@virtual.ietf.org > Action: failed > Status: 5.7.1 > Remote-MTA: dns; cloud7.spamtitan.com > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 SPF Policy Rejection t=ietf@augustcellars.com, > s=mfrom, id=cabo@tzi.org > Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org> > Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) > id 1FA95120951; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:32 -0800 (PST) > X-Original-To: xfilter-cbor-chairs@ietfa.amsl.com > Delivered-To: xfilter-cbor-chairs@ietfa.amsl.com > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DDC120944 > for <xfilter-cbor-chairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:31 -0800 (PST) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com > X-Spam-Flag: NO > X-Spam-Score: -4.2 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 > tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, > SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no > Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) > by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with ESMTP id eSAUwBWvunbS for <xfilter-cbor-chairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; > Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:29 -0800 (PST) > Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de > [134.102.50.17]) > (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) > (No client certificate requested) > by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FB26120955 > for <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:28 -0800 (PST) > Received: from dhcp-9c88.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9c88.meeting.ietf.org > [31.133.156.136]) > (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) > (No client certificate requested) > by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47JQs9168yzygB; > Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:03:24 +0100 (CET) > From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="Apple-Mail=_77956336-F9E3-4722-A9BE-E4BF91B1278F" > X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 596001800.772862-aaf3c84df25315d1f550b91493ef0952 > Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:03:22 +0800 > Subject: Rough CBOR slides > Message-Id: <DAECB3E1-E004-4A87-9B49-60E8C783E0C6@tzi.org> > To: cbor-chairs@ietf.org > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) > Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> > Resent-To: ietf@augustcellars.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com > Resent-Message-Id: <20191121040332.1FA95120951@ietfa.amsl.com> > Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:03:32 -0800 (PST)
- [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to cha… Glen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to… Michael Richardson
- [Tools-discuss] Fwd: SPF rejection of mail to cha… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chai… Jim Fenton