[Tools-discuss] nits version mismatch

Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com> Fri, 16 May 2008 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A583A6BA9; Fri, 16 May 2008 16:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27703A69C1 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2008 14:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6QioyWc5T2+s for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2008 14:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82213A6882 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2008 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m4FL2uYM007394 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2008 16:02:56 -0500
Received: from nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com (nemo.columbia.sparta.com [157.185.80.75]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.12.11/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4FL2sFP021925 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2008 16:02:56 -0500
Received: from localhost ([157.185.81.163]) by nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 15 May 2008 17:02:53 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:02:52 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0805151657260.4620@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-X-Sender: sandy@nemo.columbia.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2008 21:02:54.0025 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B11A390:01C8B6CF]
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]); Thu, 15 May 2008 16:02:56 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 May 2008 16:04:24 -0700
Subject: [Tools-discuss] nits version mismatch
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

In a discussion of draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-04.txt for secdir, I 
reported that that the nit checker showed 7 nits.  Adrian Farrell said:

>Hmmm. I wonder which nit checker you used.
>http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ only reports one warning to me as a
>referenced I-D has subsequently been published as an RFC.

to which I replied:

   I looked at the page:
   http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/l1vpn/draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode/
   which reports:


    2008-02-21 16:40 draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-04.txt
   [txt/plain]  [txt/pdf]  [nits]  [diff -from-03, wdiff, txt]
     (7 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 0 comments (--).)

   Clicking on the nits link gets you to:
...


     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 3471

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 3473

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 3477

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 4202

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 4204

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 4206

     ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 4208


        Summary: 7 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 0 comments (--).


And Adrian noted:


Interesting.
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ is at revision 2.08.08

The page you used is at revision 2.08.04

>  ** Downref: Normative reference to an Unknown state RFC: RFC 3471

Bug in the tool :-(
The RFC clearly states...
Category: Standards Track


And I volunteered to alert the Tools Team.

Hopefully, this is the right address to use for such alerts.


--Sandy
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss