IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] are IPR links on tools page working?

"VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 15 March 2013 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE43421F8576 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5vRjJODUi5P for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCFF21F856C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-64.lucent.com [135.5.2.64]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r2FMaRIw028855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:36:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r2FMZODO018761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:36:27 -0400
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.74) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:35:52 -0400
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA09.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.46]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:35:51 +0100
From: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] are IPR links on tools page working?
Thread-Index: AQHOIZto0dQ4A7sYY0+QRIVgkT3gvJinV61H
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC73040699@FR712WXCHMBA09.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <51434E2E.8010900@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <51434E2E.8010900@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC73040699FR712WXCHMBA09zeu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] are IPR links on tools page working?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:36:35 -0000

Stephen,

I think this is the case for all drafts.
As the technology element which is covered by the patent may be taken out of a draft at some point in time of its evolution, this could make sense.

-m
________________________________
De : Stephen Farrell
Envoyé : 15/03/2013 12:37
À : tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion
Objet : [Tools-discuss] are IPR links on tools page working?


Hi,

I was looking at [1] just now but there's no IPR link on that
page, though there have been declarations on earlier versions [2]
that can be found via the tracker [3].

That seems odd,
Thanks,
S.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dthakore-tls-authz-03
[2]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-dthakore-tls-authz
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dthakore-tls-authz/
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email