Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC PDF crashes viewer

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 30 June 2020 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE0D3A0A3A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=qMYaNG/L; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nozAGqox
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p_XECbxeBpva for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35B83A0C9D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71954 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2020 17:18:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1190d.5efb73cc.k2006; bh=Br/47RDxBfi1jNsFIuxOsAXjgnK26WKEglEz4q5gtpQ=; b=qMYaNG/LOGuw2Z075L6nWFxTvPLiXqX76A0AGXo3d92QB85diTYocXO7s7UfYdvPYgDpoK3DoNX6NQYztChVDT7iCeist5yTYz1ysoIlvQnrEdv/O2QL9BSaLLteYrZDrQn8INi+uRPYfocdqCtkx0MIjQ6nUFMp3scxXQU1JgIXRudXdAcLHSGtejcJZNNZ4RiGQYadpVdgK47GBQTfXD43UJVoqRMh0b7wG6cvigkUvrSUauHi7YvZH3ytFxVt
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1190d.5efb73cc.k2006; bh=Br/47RDxBfi1jNsFIuxOsAXjgnK26WKEglEz4q5gtpQ=; b=nozAGqoxOUAkvx+qFmHtSutV8WZqwgZW/HIFWHLmGDZITKKpTdQ+v54OGVp6+pzQT4hqqXmCbJhPE2yB+wiitrViwnRQ/8HNDfLmlQyCoHX+AOJMJ7rY4o8QbOLgR3Z2/RnLeK7GF83PVOZ5E7X7d7mEC8NMwRxjb7bv0b7710ZXMwYOhAIL8yz9MfU7dchsySQ9nn38fQRREy6YdxV/7/k6bxwj7yciddpk9l4zu/QgcLB6nbYf8+xMArqeBbos
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 30 Jun 2020 17:18:04 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D36311BDBA09; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:18:09 -0400
Message-Id: <20200630171809.D36311BDBA09@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3385823f-b484-ad6f-f780-c581edd1b2fe@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qou0eorMV4HQ47iX4JBIcepJCk0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] RFC PDF crashes viewer
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:18:07 -0000

In article <3385823f-b484-ad6f-f780-c581edd1b2fe@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> you write:
>Hi all,
>
>as another data point, the AUTH48 versions of the PDF rendering of
>RFC 8792 worked fine in evince.  Viewing them in MuPDF did not produce
>any error or warning messages.
>
>The published version of the PDF does crash evince, and produce error
>and warning messages (as below) in MuPDF.
>
>As an obvious difference between the two files, the published PDF
>embeds the XML version of the RFC, while the AUTH48 versions did not.

Right -- that's a pretty strong hint where the bugs are.

R's,
John