IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] what revision of markdown for IETF?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 22 June 2021 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C33A14D6 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VihLKoJYL3I for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0D93A14D4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G8cKQ0gznz2xJH; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:44:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <58C5CB55-57AE-4836-98E2-5B9307AE6C1C@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:44:09 +0200
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 646083849.361039-943ebb00d49b90d396bee740367bbb38
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6846448-DF89-4B3A-B239-9194CE72B1A0@tzi.org>
References: <25460.1624388436@localhost> <B9FABF7B-55CD-4C63-97E1-6B39E285E1EE@tzi.org> <58C5CB55-57AE-4836-98E2-5B9307AE6C1C@tzi.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qxQYYgQtME8nwRVPJWMHBb97et0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] what revision of markdown for IETF?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:44:17 -0000

On 2021-06-22, at 21:19, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, the renderer employed there does not leave a signature, so I don’t know which one was used.

If it’s Python markdown (I have had no way to mine the ietfdb source properly since git-svn gave its last gasp on my machine), that considers tables to be an “extension” that needs to be switched on explicitly.

The same seems to be true for Python markdown2, which the silver searcher does find in the belly of the datatracker.

https://github.com/trentm/python-markdown2/wiki/Extras

… would need, say,
tables
fenced-code-blocks
strike
cuddled-lists

strike because of our propensity to change agenda lists at the last moment :-)
cuddled-lists because many of us are lazy.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email