[Tools-discuss] Managed to break rfcdiff?
Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4B21F84B7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90NEU+uDdJ6t for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62B221F84B6 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Trace: 718675347/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$OFF_NET_AUTH_ACCEPTED/None/81.187.254.249/None/elwynd@dial.pipex.com
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 81.187.254.249
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: elwynd@dial.pipex.com
X-SMTP-AUTH: elwynd@dial.pipex.com
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArkEAHUZc1FRu/75/2dsb2JhbABQg3DBboNSQD0WGAMCAQIBSw0IAQGIFJp1oEGTDQOXFYV4iyCDDQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,517,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="718675347"
X-IP-Direction: OUT
Received: from weee-pc2.folly.org.uk (HELO [81.187.254.249]) ([81.187.254.249]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2013 23:43:58 +0100
Message-ID: <51731A2A.7040200@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 23:43:54 +0100
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF tools <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Managed to break rfcdiff?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:44:08 -0000
Hi. I was trying to generate a diff between RFC3530 and draft-ietf-nfs-rfc3530bis-25 just now but keep getting an empty page back (tried on more than one machine). I also tried a diff between -00 and -25 in the tracker with the same result. I believe this worked about 2 weeks ago but it is a very large diff Regards, Elwyn
- [Tools-discuss] Managed to break rfcdiff? Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Managed to break rfcdiff? Dan Wing