Re: [Tools-discuss] [irsg] [EXTERNAL] Question about Codimd for w.g. minutes

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 29 July 2021 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB463A101C for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7agpfvlSTyGT for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF983A101B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GbRt26FbWz31Qd; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 01:43:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <0592d397-65c5-71b2-2a09-e1ebbccc52e6@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 01:43:06 +0200
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 649294986.486762-a6519902558d83f293e244b7617cf54d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43AD0E13-4450-4CB1-AC3E-4A73408B613F@tzi.org>
References: <F3BF3819-EEB9-48F1-BA3F-78719EDEDA62@tzi.org> <FCCF495C-A7A5-46B4-BE21-7E7E3A659F08@tzi.org> <0592d397-65c5-71b2-2a09-e1ebbccc52e6@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/uGJHCfEVzzZQwtlT_at0ITNPUws>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [irsg] [EXTERNAL] Question about Codimd for w.g. minutes
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:43:13 -0000

OK, I’m mostly interested in minutes.

It seems markdown non-2 only has the super-brittle original markdown double end-of-line spaces and <br/>.  Not the choice I was hoping for, but maybe what was to be expected (this is not a well-lit part of the markdown landscape).

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2021-07-30, at 01:19, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm aiming to move all places markdown in the datatracker to render using https://github.com/Python-Markdown/markdown (not markdown2), providing extensions=['extra'] to the rendering call.
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> On 7/29/21 5:06 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> Which markdown dialect(s) does the datatracker like these days?
>> 
>> (I’m asking because I need to know whether <br/> should be input as “  “ at the end of line (original brittle way), “\\” (not as widely used), or “<br/>” (ugly).)
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [irsg] [EXTERNAL] Question about Codimd for w.g. minutes
>>> Date: 2021-07-29 at 23:37:19 CEST
>>> To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
>>> Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
>>> Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/jt_aPWObx7WFed-I7Won1IxNjvE>
>>> Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irsg/NPtVuQ_rt3m8teinaDF8jMboCX0>
>>> Message-Id: <F3BF3819-EEB9-48F1-BA3F-78719EDEDA62@tzi.org>
>>> 
>>> On 2021-07-29, at 22:13, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:
>>>> The main edit I do is to put blank lines between all paragraphs. Then I upload the .md file to datatracker.
>>> I might throw a little tool that does that into the next kramdown-rfc revision.  Maybe just in time for other people’s minutes…
>>> 
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>> 
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
>> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
>> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
>> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
>> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss