IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Submitted draft is missing from tools

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sat, 20 February 2021 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D5E3A0C6D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:37:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJ0uxVCnNEIk for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:37:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986473A0C6C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:37:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 11KKbNl0019927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:37:27 -0500
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:37:22 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210220203722.GM21@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dded6c99-1e3d-92be-fcbb-258ce4ce67e2@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/vVO2tVwttaje9MlTwC5iA4uNjgw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Submitted draft is missing from tools
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:37:31 -0000

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Every updated draft I've looked for recently after an I-D announcement
> was missing from the tools site. You just have to use the version in the
> datatracker until the tools site catches up, which seems to take a while
> these days.

To add another data point for how long it takes tools to catch up,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06 is
currently unavailable (404) but the -06 was posted just shy of 4 days ago.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email