Re: [Tools-discuss] Colored bars on top of HTML RFCs

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 May 2013 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F0021F8E9D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.283, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i2MOxZ2hXyqA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE00921F8EF7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4GKvmvE018044; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p54891B94.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.27.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ACC93111; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV5CAz8-918QMNufdWbXObEEwuuBAnwhDizYHoVuL-Y3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:57:47 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A436092-D19B-4375-BFEE-4941EDD6DBCE@tzi.org>
References: <A0E7DEB2-1263-4F07-8E0B-3A39C8AA2520@tzi.org> <CABkgnnV5CAz8-918QMNufdWbXObEEwuuBAnwhDizYHoVuL-Y3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Colored bars on top of HTML RFCs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:58:04 -0000

> Since the document is clearly standards track, but not explicitly
> PS/DS/FS, it's probably related to the metadata, which I'm guessing
> isn't available for this RFC.

rfc-index.txt has little ambiguity here:

6775 Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless
     Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs). Z. Shelby, Ed., S. Chakrabarti, E.
     Nordmark, C. Bormann. November 2012. (Format: TXT=130616 bytes)
     (Updates RFC4944) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)

So, yes, it seems there is a metadata problem.

Grüße, Carsten