Re: [Tools-discuss] List of drafts on the status page

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A50E21F87E4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qenMzhzfnDJa for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ADD21F869E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyn-fg128.sth.netnod.se ([77.72.226.128]:49377) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1U8Ati-0003GQ-Nx; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:50 +0100
Message-ID: <5124E126.9060204@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:50 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5123F3BD.3040702@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5123F3BD.3040702@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 77.72.226.128
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] List of drafts on the status page
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:43:52 -0000

Hi Yaron,

On 2013-02-19 22:50 Yaron Sheffer said:
> Hi,
> 
> on our status page ( http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/) there's a list of 
> "related active documents". But many of them are not really active, they've been 
> published as RFCs. For example, we have "draft-devarapalli-ipsec-ikev2-redirect 
> replaced by draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect", but that one was published as 
> RFC 5685 (which is noted at the top of the same page). Shouldn't such documents 
> be omitted from the list altogether?

Yup, that seems reasonable.  I'll see if I can make it so :-)


Best regards,

	Henrik