Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatracker
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 19 November 2019 08:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D331208BD for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:43:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id juiqBqdC5fur for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05C112089B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:43:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:6e88:14ff:fe34:93bc]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FAB81F450; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:43:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D5F981371; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:43:10 +0800 (+08)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <560990cf-c76f-add2-ed38-1a741601ec32@nostrum.com>
References: <18512.1574107042@dooku.sandelman.ca> <560990cf-c76f-add2-ed38-1a741601ec32@nostrum.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> message dated "Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:24:04 -0600."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:43:10 +0800
Message-ID: <7461.1574152990@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/yVqhgTVhEIfjzoPP2JlHzD3FgRU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:43:20 -0000
> On 11/18/19 1:57 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> Hi, my understanding is that xml2rfc.ietf.org is just a redirect to >> tools.ietf.org, and is not yet supported. >> >> Meanwhile, the datatracker.ietf.org is supported, and now are doing >> XML as primary submission format, and that involves the datatracker >> reaching out to xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org to run xml2rfc. So, if >> xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org is down, or is missing a generated >> reference. file, then I can't submit documents via the datatracker. >> >> (Or I have to submit .txt files, perhaps, which I don't know if I do >> programmatically) >> >> What is the plan to rationalize this support situation? > The datatracker has its own instance of xml2rfc installed locally (see > the requirements.txt file). > When you submit through the datatracker, that local instance is > used. The datatracker does not call out to tools.ietf.org. You misunderstand me. The reference.* files are searched for on xml2rfc.tools.ietc.org/...bibxml*/... So if the file is missing, the XML does not render. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatracker Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatrack… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatrack… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatrack… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc archives vs datatrack… Michael Richardson