Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback
Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Tue, 30 June 2009 12:47 UTC
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDC828C3BC for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnLu6xU5Rf4a for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C8D28C3A2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:60062) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MLckv-0001eT-Ng; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:48:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4A4A098D.20603@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:48:13 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
References: <A121AD3A-B30D-43D3-9407-3B7B488C21DA@bgp.nu>
In-Reply-To: <A121AD3A-B30D-43D3-9407-3B7B488C21DA@bgp.nu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jgs@bgp.nu, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:47:56 -0000
Hi John, On 2009-06-29 16:12 John G. Scudder said the following: > Folks, > > When checking the nits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt (http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt > ), idnits complains: > > == Outdated reference: A later version (-03) exists of > draft-ietf-rtgwg-ordered-fib-02 > > However, no such later version actually exists, -02 is really the > latest. > > Not sure why idnits is confused. FYI. Gremlins in the state file on the tools servers. Fixed. Best, Henrik
- [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback John G. Scudder
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback Henrik Levkowetz