IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Emacs lock files in rfc rsync

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 05 February 2021 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7B43A0CEE for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XN0ND3cWw62N for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E97E3A0CED for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 115MkCYA023350 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:46:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1612565172; bh=3HBShVLdD9JNrZN2kUW/YHT+TDnxt+SQagqBUC1VyYM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PBNcwTmI+ipXDkGDNF5PdJIFHuFmuiI5dHMmKUGyRz6WXG3BJE4u0jxmcDLAW3MVm KTWClp7WlHMOHXRkbnwSbzvFtqjMbrWGbujZBCfpBq7jDck/MtOlkjBn5UdmDpVuJ9 CirJDJAFo2ERqcKeY6BA9tFxzpOT7oOrx259iITE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: tools-implementation@ietf.org
References: <4a72d3ce-c790-a190-b3de-f4bd10337e39@amsl.com> <4474bb5c-bb5b-d708-1f8a-de8e90ce0619@amsl.com> <e5bcf5f442ed44a0941577102006d964@cert.org> <8d6f5894-2d6f-3a96-6c95-079f3a30b727@nostrum.com> <a2d903ec-d942-9d2c-6296-69fc191ae189@amsl.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9a13bed3-0e29-c82d-e951-4e33c0a33f70@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:46:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a2d903ec-d942-9d2c-6296-69fc191ae189@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/1s3oI9S67hiaUcKxnnfqOTPQoRU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Emacs lock files in rfc rsync
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:46:17 -0000

On 2/5/21 4:38 PM, Glen wrote:
> On 2/5/2021 13:50, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> Specifically this would be the next tools-implementation team meeting.
>> We don't have one of those scheduled (as we didn't have anything 
>> immediate to discuss). We can schedule one now.
>> 1600 UTC had been working for us - is it still a reasonable time? If 
>> so, is Fri 12Feb open for folks.
>
> I cannot do anytime Wed-Fri this week.  My electric company has 
> decided they need to dig up the street I live on, and I expect to be 
> without power here on Wed, Thu and Fri (Fortunately only during the 
> day, but, still.)  I've already had to "book the office" for Wednesday 
> owing to critical events that day, not comfortable with later in the 
> week either.
>
> Monday or Tuesday of the following week would be better for me.
>
> That said, our one item is not particularly urgent and we are still 
> pushing on larger projects, so I did not mean to imply that a meeting 
> was urgent.  I think we can wait until after 110 safely.
Ok - will defer for the moment.
>
> Glen
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email