[Tools-implementation] Fwd: Places that need updated to get rid of FTP
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 September 2020 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE8F3A09F1 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tfsrdpOjda_d for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2CC3A0972 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 08UEWTmb082276 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:32:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1601476350; bh=DYgbZ434dhmCheAZ440hKnKKwEbnO2xN9r0w4GJxupU=; h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=D7r9N1/1HgD2xAPJ5bqwXLy9W6/ZMVqsBD5EHihHEZrRUd9sF4FJK7YTZ2b8IevHU AqNRHn2GvoEyQHkYZ17cWD26pmkT6fyOP2GzFZxK5tI63sIQ8c+AP6R0uyugdH+3I1 8tSDGTsSqFGb4dsGuvMKextSvN0wmPCBljqLAll4=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
References: <7D2E7214-12CB-4118-B143-0260B7806407@vigilsec.com>
To: "tools-implementation@ietf.org" <tools-implementation@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <7D2E7214-12CB-4118-B143-0260B7806407@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <ca4dbb79-498f-26b1-4722-ee65f1a1e61b@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:32:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7D2E7214-12CB-4118-B143-0260B7806407@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1F1D829B188037B94C3143D3"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/H2MrdOt088jWngCJxelh7DDHilc>
Subject: [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Places that need updated to get rid of FTP
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:32:33 -0000
I've asked Scott for his thoughts on what updating the ITU doc below might look like. I think we should assume it will take some time, and be pleasantly surprised if it can be done very quickly. That suggests we should move forward with the separated FTP service that Glen started to build, so it is not in the way when we start moving files around. RjS -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Places that need updated to get rid of FTP Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:06:10 -0400 From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Roman D. Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> CC: Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com> Robert and Roman: I forgot they the MOU with ITU has them. We call it RFC 2436. The ITU calls it ITU-T A Suppl. 3 <https://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=11724>, and it keeps getting approved. We should reach out to them with proposed changes to the URLs, even if we do not turn off FTP quickly so that this does not become a boat anchor. Russ
- [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Places that need upda… Robert Sparks