IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-implementation] Revisiting whether we should continue using Docker as we currently do.

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CE83A0C30 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hc_9jhv9W-or for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C883A0C28 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:61221 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1kG4q8-0007sS-8P; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:29:04 -0700
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, "tools-implementation@ietf.org" <tools-implementation@ietf.org>
References: <3ae28788-898a-de72-22b6-b0f036d1b23a@nostrum.com> <55624944-8b1b-317b-94fe-3212d6ef60fe@levkowetz.com> <1c0ac174-c75d-4af5-f54a-3419b854d189@nostrum.com>
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <972828d1-6a92-7217-b216-db52ec651bcb@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:28:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1c0ac174-c75d-4af5-f54a-3419b854d189@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GlMumqoI92bdPNL0wTQOjCNpTritjcsog"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-implementation@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/Rt9Mh3Cx-maP37w5Hf4bxcZw3kg>
Subject: Re: [Tools-implementation] Revisiting whether we should continue using Docker as we currently do.
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:29:06 -0000

On 2020-09-09 20:08, Robert Sparks wrote:
> 
> On 9/9/20 12:55 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On 2020-09-09 18:21, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>
>>> So I again suggest that we unroll for the production deploys, at least
>>> for now. I think we can unroll everything at this point, but there might
>>> still be a hitch in unrolling the trac instances. Henrik - could you
>>> remind me what our thinking was with respect to those?
>> Since we're now running apache with a python 3.6 mod_wsgi, we cannot run
>> Trac under mod_wsgi until it's available for Python 3.  (There's progress,
>> but it's not there yet).  Which means moving it to nginx if we're not going
>> to use Docker.
> Glen mentioned possibly using mod_wsgi-express to run a separate apache 
> instance that loaded the 2.7 module rather than the 3.6 module?

I don't think you can run 2 Apache instances with different mod_wsgi modules
without containerizing one of them?


	Henrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email