Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sandy,

On 2012-01-30 20:54 Murphy, Sandra said the following:
> Saw this last week, checked, it worked! Thanks, Henrik. And sorry for
> forgetting the thanks at the time.

No problem.  And you're welcome :-)

Best regards,

	Henrik

> 
> --Sandy
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Henrik Levkowetz [[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:31 AM
> To: Murphy, Sandra
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue
> 
> Hi Sandy,
> 
> On 2012-01-13 20:48 Murphy, Sandra said:
>> On the tools site, the wg status pages (eg
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr) have a section for drafts in the
>> RFC-Editor's queue.
>>
>> The URL used points to queue.html.  That page exists (and is kept
>> current), but had been replaced by queue2.html.  The two are very
>> similar but the queue2 page contains more info.
>>
>> E.g., the link on http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr for the architecture
>> draft points to
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch while the
>> link on http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/ points to
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch.
>>
>> Right now, a bunch of documents are in auth48, and the queue2 page
>> has a link to a page indicating which authors have responded.
>> queue.html is missing this link.
>>
>> I find the tools page very useful and tend to use that page more than
>> the datatracker page.  But the queue2 link to the author responses is
>> very very helpful.  Would be very very good if the tools page pointed
>> to the queue2 page (to spare me the pain of remembering to check
>> both).
> 
> Fixed in the template source.  Should be visible on individual WG pages
> within about an hour.
> 
>> (Don't think I'm not appreciative of the tools team work.  I am.
>> Very very.)
> 
> Thank you :-)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>         Henrik