Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue

["Murphy, Sandra" <[e-mail]>]

Saw this last week, checked, it worked!  Thanks, Henrik.  And sorry for forgetting the thanks at the time.

--Sandy

________________________________________
From: Henrik Levkowetz [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:31 AM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Tools-team] link to rfc editor queue points to wrong queue

Hi Sandy,

On 2012-01-13 20:48 Murphy, Sandra said:
> On the tools site, the wg status pages (eg
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr) have a section for drafts in the
> RFC-Editor's queue.
>
> The URL used points to queue.html.  That page exists (and is kept
> current), but had been replaced by queue2.html.  The two are very
> similar but the queue2 page contains more info.
>
> E.g., the link on http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr for the architecture
> draft points to
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch while the
> link on http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/ points to
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#draft-ietf-sidr-arch.
>
> Right now, a bunch of documents are in auth48, and the queue2 page
> has a link to a page indicating which authors have responded.
> queue.html is missing this link.
>
> I find the tools page very useful and tend to use that page more than
> the datatracker page.  But the queue2 link to the author responses is
> very very helpful.  Would be very very good if the tools page pointed
> to the queue2 page (to spare me the pain of remembering to check
> both).

Fixed in the template source.  Should be visible on individual WG pages
within about an hour.

> (Don't think I'm not appreciative of the tools team work.  I am.
> Very very.)

Thank you :-)


Best regards,

        Henrik