FW: Comment & Q: ECML 1.1 Internet draft
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> Mon, 15 January 2001 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-trade-errors@lists.elistx.com>
Received: from ELIST-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #44856) id <0G7700J04UXJ38@eListX.com> (original mail from Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #44856) id <0G7700J01UXJ36@eListX.com> for ietf-trade@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #44856) id <0G7700J01UXJ35@eListX.com> for ietf-trade@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from motgate.mot.com (motgate.mot.com [129.188.136.100]) by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #44856) with ESMTP id <0G7700HFZUXIHA@eListX.com> for ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:20:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: [from pobox3.mot.com (pobox3.mot.com [10.64.251.242]) by motgate.mot.com (motgate 2.1) with ESMTP id LAA23255 for <ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:19:21 -0700 (MST)
Received: [from ma07exm01.corp.isg.mot.com (ma07exm01.corp.isg.mot.com [134.33.90.80]) by pobox3.mot.com (MOT-pobox3 2.0) with ESMTP id LAA13408 for <ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:15:42 -0700 (MST)
Received: by ma07exm01.corp.isg.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) id <CKR1992C>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:19:20 -0500
Content-return: allowed
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:19:12 -0500
From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
Subject: FW: Comment & Q: ECML 1.1 Internet draft
To: "'ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com'" <ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com>
Message-id: <51228FAD179FD4118A8600D0B76FE2621881D8@ma07exm01.corp.isg.mot.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
Content-type: text/plain
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-trade-help@lists.elistx.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-trade@lists.elistx.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-trade-request@lists.elistx.com?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-trade-request@lists.elistx.com?body=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-trade>
List-Help: <http://lists.elistx.com/doc/email-manage.html>, <mailto:ietf-trade-request@lists.elistx.com?body=help>
This is a comment on the v1.1 draft but is relevant to v2 of ECML... -----Original Message----- From: mia.lahteenmaki@nokia.com [mailto:mia.lahteenmaki@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 12:48 PM To: Donald.Eastlake Subject: Comment & Q: ECML 1.1 Internet draft ... I read through the ECML 1.1 internet draft and noticed that it is prepared for mobile transactions by providing in the Ecom_Payment_Card_Protocol field the initial list tokens like 'simcard' and 'phoneid'. If I understand correctly, the explanation of these tokens refer to the use of of some, probably operator-specific system, either for billing via phone bill or by using some SIM toolkit-based solutions. So, unlike other tokens, these tokens do not refer to a specific protocol. IMHO, this could be problematic in cases where the merchant and wallet user are not using the services of the same operator for payments. The token 'simcard' for example may then mean different things on the wallet side and on the merchant side. ... Best Regards, Mia Mia Lahteenmaki mia.lahteenmaki@nokia.com (Nokia Research Center) mobile +358 40 7431965 fax +358 9 4376 6139 Note: These comments and views are solely mine and not my employer's
- FW: Comment & Q: ECML 1.1 Internet draft Eastlake III Donald-LDE008