Re: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10.txt

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 18 September 2018 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527FA130E05; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWJ0c2ROfhzc; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95C4130DF3; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5986; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1537237961; x=1538447561; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=cCnfzjS7EnORoFmJlyhZo7XYGjIpbq2h3ZZWcPnRCu0=; b=FSfT0lavAquzDeMvRZ4eA2rMOLlTxyM4olgSas9nRBGYBG84M0EJg6wB DrJ1gqToSWq9G5D+chKRil6ZuBAw1RB+RHYxth4fpP5FFG+TunE00kTQT xdEwyNZOg1MhlyndKTerzXt8yVwbQnuX5MY3quN6RyfkUNc+PkD3fhers g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AZAAAYY6Bb/5FdJa1aGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEIAQEBAYFQgghlfygKi32MLIpriDOFOxSBZgsjhEkCg3IhNBgBAwEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAm0cDIU5BnkQAgEIPwchERQRAgQOBYMhAYEdTAMVD6cRhC8GgwQNgkoFim0?= =?us-ascii?q?XgUE/gRInH4JMglZFAQECAQEWgQ8ig0iCJgKNT4VqiGMsCQKGP4ZCgxcXjw2?= =?us-ascii?q?LZGyHZAIRFIElHTiBVXAVGksBgkGLFYU+b4wkgR4BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,387,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="456798313"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Sep 2018 02:32:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-008.cisco.com (xch-rcd-008.cisco.com [173.37.102.18]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w8I2WexZ015012 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 02:32:40 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-008.cisco.com (173.37.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:32:40 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:32:39 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud@ietf.org>, "tram-chairs@ietf.org" <tram-chairs@ietf.org>, "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@rbbn.com>, "tram mailing list" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUToRLc6Q7p6xpkEihdC4aAwpNxaT1KzAAgAB7VYA=
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 02:32:39 +0000
Message-ID: <9E08979B-DFF0-46CD-9BA1-6754D91336A1@cisco.com>
References: <153718828872.24836.7251436008764780088@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-fSFSYrppaR1hbUtP9nU0sd6oie=ttitNrri8VOgp+tsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-fSFSYrppaR1hbUtP9nU0sd6oie=ttitNrri8VOgp+tsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.239.18]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9E08979BDFF046CD9BA16754D91336A1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.18, xch-rcd-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/2l7BDVrM41x8Vma9ZcyRjVxJGoU>
Subject: Re: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10.txt
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 02:32:45 -0000


On Sep 17, 2018, at 3:11 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Shepherd + Authors,

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:45 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the TURN Revised and Modernized WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Path MTU Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
        Authors         : Marc Petit-Huguenin
                          Gonzalo Salgueiro
        Filename        : draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10.txt
        Pages           : 18
        Date            : 2018-09-17

Abstract:
   This document describes a Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
   Usage for Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) between a client and a server.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10

This seems to address the GEN and SEC reviews.

In your opinion, is it ready for the IESG?

The authors think so.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


Thanks,

Spencer