Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!)
"Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com> Thu, 20 March 2014 14:48 UTC
Return-Path: <praspati@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EFA1A08E9 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aNmGo_1zPCgi for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA841A074E for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2486; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1395326883; x=1396536483; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=r/0kkrUH6pFcVEqK+WL9P1qVif0msgbZx1aRmQbSNKE=; b=fNuW9Iw7LnfK78Mjl2VZe1BDhaI3JnhfyPiT9w/qlWf/iAqzRyjnMlw4 MvMGx+lz2E3lTW8X/vvKuudtPRdE/Ii+CSNbuPy9lRv0aFgbgrrMXNgkI 3Bk78wKwrmghTNH+22/XHMBEov090p9yc134MfmwArPyEk0DwCy7qmnUx A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFACb/KlOtJXG//2dsb2JhbABQCYMGO1e7G4czgRgWdIImAQEEAQEBJBM0GwIBCDYQJwslAgQBEgkSh14Nz1YXjgIBBwcCAgFRBYQ4BJhHgTKQfoMtgis
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,695,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="29008292"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2014 14:48:03 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2KEm36V001604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:48:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.7.116]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:48:03 -0500
From: "Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!)
Thread-Index: AQHPREtlatIbewbwn0WFgqmF2DvJFA==
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:48:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CF50FD66.25EA0%praspati@cisco.com>
References: <532AF25B.4020301@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <532AF25B.4020301@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.127.18.26]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C17BFF5168849D419AE237B893A47CE9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/6w9vusRnmHq6_lk702xsdkFoPjQ
Subject: Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:48:14 -0000
On 3/20/14 7:21 PM, "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote: >Tramsters, > >During the meeting in London there was a mixed reaction to the >presentation of draft-patil-tram-turn-serv-disc-00. We heard very few >hums both for and against adoption. > >As a reminder, here is the related milestone: > >Sep 2014 - Send new TURN server discovery mechanism for enterprises and >ISPs to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard > >I'd like people to respond to this email explaining their position >regarding the presented solution. Why do you (not) support it? What is >missing? What would be a good solution in your opinion? It seems we did >not have time to fully discuss those questions face-to-face, so let's do >it here. > >Basically, the draft proposes two mechanisms: DHCP and anycast. We know >each of these solutions has drawbacks which were well discussed. The >question is: are they deal breakers, or could we live with them? The first mechanism is actually Service Resolution. The draft suggests DHCP as the primary means to obtain a domain name which can be used for service resolution. There was a suggestion that domain name could also be extracted from own SIP/XMPP/email identity (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/current/msg00156.html)- which we plan to add to the draft in the next version. -Prashanth > >WPAD was also discussed. The main issue seems to be that WPAD is not >really standardized anywhere. IMHO this issue can be worked around if >the solution is good technically. So, how is it technically? Would it >work? What are the drawbacks? I don't think this has been discussed >enough. > >Martin Stiemerling proposed that we look at draft-kist-alto-3pdisc for >inspiration. As I understand it, that solution relies on the client's IP >address "owner" (e.g. the ISP or enterprise) to populate the DNS reverse >zone (i.e., in-addr.arpa or ip6.arpa) with appropriate NAPTR records >pointing to the network-provided TURN server. Can this work? This is a >new idea for which I have not seen any discussion yet. > >Let's solve this! > >Thanks, >Simon >-- >DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca >NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca >STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca > >_______________________________________________ >tram mailing list >tram@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Cb B
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Cb B
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Karl Stahl
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Brandon Williams
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Karl Stahl
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Karl Stahl
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] TURN server discovery (please discuss!) Karl Stahl